Can this replace academic review?

No. It helps you triage faster, but teacher judgment is still the core decision-maker.

How should schools use detector scores?

Use scores to guide follow-up questions, then verify with real writing process evidence.

A practical AI detection workflow for schools and universities: faster screening, fairer review.

Teachers and TAs review a lot of writing under tight deadlines, but standards still need to stay fair.

The hard part is balancing speed with evidence: flag risk quickly without overreacting to one score.

Run a quick scan first to flag sections worth a closer look.

Then review with your rubric: sources, reasoning depth, and revision history when needed.

Example: during essay grading week, TAs can pre-check intros and conclusions before full read-through.

Treat the score as supporting evidence, not an automatic conclusion.

Keep criteria explicit so teachers and students understand the process.